<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semi-illegal GOD IS FAKE money stamps now available!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://normalbobsmith.com/latestupdates/2009/11/19/semi-illegal-god-is-fake-money-stamps-now-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://normalbobsmith.com/latestupdates/2009/11/19/semi-illegal-god-is-fake-money-stamps-now-available/</link>
	<description>“Ask forgiveness, not permission.”</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martriga</title>
		<link>http://normalbobsmith.com/latestupdates/2009/11/19/semi-illegal-god-is-fake-money-stamps-now-available/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Martriga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normalbobsmith.com/latestupdates/?p=443#comment-623</guid>
		<description>On the other stamp thread Bob wrote:

"I’ve also been told that crossing out the word GOD eliminates it so it needs to be stamped on there again. Does that make sense?"

Oh for christsakes Bob,  nobody told you that and you know it.
Be as sarcastic as you want! You're the messing with the feds, not me.


RE: "Does that make sense?"

It makes about as much "sense" as walking into a Gov't building with a brand
new phone to donate with the intention smashing a Gov't phone first.

You smash the phone and think,"It's o.k.- i'll just give them mine."
It does'nt matter if it's money or phones.
Someone's gonna get busted either way. 

Wether we like it or not the money is still federal property.
We can party with it and have a great old time or save it
but it has to be (within reason) in the same condition it was recieved.

Don't believe me?
Go into any federal building, stamp a bill right in front of the guards
and see how the rest of your day goes.
Their equal-opportunity enforcers, too.
They'll bust you regardless of your political/religious affiliation
or lack thereof.

I'm very surprised you even relplied to my comment.
I'm surprised because
your reply is so vague considering the fact you not only will
be drawing very unwanted attention  with a money stamp,
but you broadcast your intentions of doing so.
Actually, considering how difficult it is to trace
the many perpetrators (those who stamp money)
they may even take a special interest in you.


RE: "it needs to be stamped on there again. "

From the standpoint of legality, that's not going to
work as "defacement" has already taken place.

You can't "stamp" or replace any part of the bill/coin defaced
to the required specifications of the original.
If you did you'd be counterfeiting.



"Beware the ides of March" Ceasar was warned.


If you don't take any of this seriously then at least make a cartoon out of it.
Please include Jesus laughing because he's scoring points here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other stamp thread Bob wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;I’ve also been told that crossing out the word GOD eliminates it so it needs to be stamped on there again. Does that make sense?&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh for christsakes Bob,  nobody told you that and you know it.<br />
Be as sarcastic as you want! You&#8217;re the messing with the feds, not me.</p>
<p>RE: &#8220;Does that make sense?&#8221;</p>
<p>It makes about as much &#8220;sense&#8221; as walking into a Gov&#8217;t building with a brand<br />
new phone to donate with the intention smashing a Gov&#8217;t phone first.</p>
<p>You smash the phone and think,&#8221;It&#8217;s o.k.- i&#8217;ll just give them mine.&#8221;<br />
It does&#8217;nt matter if it&#8217;s money or phones.<br />
Someone&#8217;s gonna get busted either way. </p>
<p>Wether we like it or not the money is still federal property.<br />
We can party with it and have a great old time or save it<br />
but it has to be (within reason) in the same condition it was recieved.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me?<br />
Go into any federal building, stamp a bill right in front of the guards<br />
and see how the rest of your day goes.<br />
Their equal-opportunity enforcers, too.<br />
They&#8217;ll bust you regardless of your political/religious affiliation<br />
or lack thereof.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very surprised you even relplied to my comment.<br />
I&#8217;m surprised because<br />
your reply is so vague considering the fact you not only will<br />
be drawing very unwanted attention  with a money stamp,<br />
but you broadcast your intentions of doing so.<br />
Actually, considering how difficult it is to trace<br />
the many perpetrators (those who stamp money)<br />
they may even take a special interest in you.</p>
<p>RE: &#8220;it needs to be stamped on there again. &#8221;</p>
<p>From the standpoint of legality, that&#8217;s not going to<br />
work as &#8220;defacement&#8221; has already taken place.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t &#8220;stamp&#8221; or replace any part of the bill/coin defaced<br />
to the required specifications of the original.<br />
If you did you&#8217;d be counterfeiting.</p>
<p>&#8220;Beware the ides of March&#8221; Ceasar was warned.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t take any of this seriously then at least make a cartoon out of it.<br />
Please include Jesus laughing because he&#8217;s scoring points here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

